|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61 |
There is a kid who has been at 14 and under for 3 years now,he wrestled 14 and under 100 this year atDistrict 4 i just think this should be checked out.
Thank You
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 937
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 937 |
you might want to put a name!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61 |
He took 1st at District 4 you do the math. It would probably be nice to get this taken care of because im sure there is a 5th place kid willing to go to state. Thank You
Last edited by KansasBoy; 03/21/09 10:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 180
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 180 |
U got my curiosity up. Did some research.
2002 8U 52 lbs. 2003 8U 55 lbs. State qualifier 2004 10U 58 lbs. 5th at state 2005 10U 64 lbs. state qualifier 2006 12U 72 lbs. 2007 14U 80 lbs. 2nd at state 2008 14U 90 lbs. 5th at state 2009 14U 100 lbs. District champion state qualifier
looks like he wrestled up in 2007 instead of wrestling at the top of the age group in 12U.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555 |
That is illegal...lets take away his placing in 2007, would that make you feel better? I don't think it warrants kicking him out of the tournament this year.
Last edited by Beeson; 03/21/09 10:11 PM.
Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 61 |
ok well thank you beeson i just wanted to know if he was supposed to be in 16 and under this year or if he started 14 and under early and if anything could be done about it this year.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 26
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 26 |
Rules are rules. It should be checked out at least. Maybe the coaches and parents didn't know better. If not then they need to be informed. Not really fair to all involved no matter how you look at it.
Jim Broeckelman Proud to be a Bluejay!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 147
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 147 |
so u guys are sayin that even though he is 14 and under, he shouldnt be wrestlin 14 and under cause he wrestled up in 2007? or u sayin he shouldnt have wrestled up in 2007? i dont see whats wrong
Carlos Garate
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 38 |
What is the difference in all the 6 and under boys wrestling at district in 8 and under and then wrestling sunday at 6 and under. I think they should pick their true age and stay there. How many true 8 and under boys were knocked out because of that. And why do they get to wrestle in both? Lose one, try another? Just like their weight. There were too many boys that I know that dropped weight for a better position to go to state. These are only kids mostly 10 and under. Some dropped 9 lbs! How healthy is that? It's not the kid's fault-they don't think of dropping weight unless encouraged to do so.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 49
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 49 |
I believe what the original poster meant was to be sure that this wrestler is not supposed to be at 16 and under this year. He may have wrestled up the first year he was at 14 and under and was actually only in the 12 and under age bracket. I don't think there is anything wrong with that, unless for some strange reason it is stated in the rules that a wrestler can't wrestler up at subs, disrict, state. (I don't think so though, because of the six and under wrestlers who wrestle 8 and under.)
I would want to have his age clarified also if I saw this in my wrestler's bracket. However, as of yet, unless it has been in a pm to the original poster, it hasn't been.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,443
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,443 |
He may have wrestled up the first year he was at 14 and under and was actually only in the 12 and under age bracket. I don't think there is anything wrong with that, unless for some strange reason it is stated in the rules that a wrestler can't wrestler up at subs, disrict, state. (I don't think so though, because of the six and under wrestlers who wrestle 8 and under.) Rules Modifications for Qualifying Tournaments Rule 4 No additional age or weight classes are allowed. At no time will a wrestler be permitted to wrestle out of their age division unless it is specifically stated in these standing rules. The divisions are 8 and Under, 9 & 10, 11 & 12, 13 & 14, and 15 & 16.
Richard D. Salyer
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377 |
He may have wrestled up the first year he was at 14 and under and was actually only in the 12 and under age bracket. I don't think there is anything wrong with that, unless for some strange reason it is stated in the rules that a wrestler can't wrestler up at subs, disrict, state. (I don't think so though, because of the six and under wrestlers who wrestle 8 and under.) Rules Modifications for Qualifying Tournements Rule 4 No additional age or weight classes are allowed. At no time will a wrestler be permitted to wrestle out of their age division unless it is specifically stated in these standing rules. The divisions are 8 and Under, 9 & 10, 11 & 12, 13 & 14, and 15 & 16. Saw that coming a mile away. Way to keep 'em honest Richard.
Lee Girard
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 49
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 49 |
Richard, thank you for the information on the rules. That being said, why then is this wrestler at 14 and under for the third year. As I mentioned before, I think that is all KansasBoy is trying to find out. Is he actually 14 and under this year and the error was made back in 2007 (which of course can not be changed now), or should he be wrestling 16 and under.
-Chris
Live YOUR life, not the life others want you to live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 15
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 15 |
I believe he is at the top of 14u..my son used to wrestle him years ago and they were alwasys the same age..so, that would make the issue 2007 when he should have wrestled 12u...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4 |
It is my understanding from these posts that you are not allowed to wrestle up in age brackets. It doesn't take a lot of common sense to see why. Look at the 10 and under 52 pound bracket, for example. There are only 8 wrestlers in the state bracket. There are a tremendous number of 8 and under 52 pounders who did not make it to state because they had packed brackets and were beat out at subs or districts. I remember as a kid seeing several of my buddies place at national tournaments or state tournaments with only 4 people in their bracket while I was slugging it out in 16 man brackets. That was the advantage they had in being 14 and weighing 80 pounds (or whatever it was). I bet there are a lot of 8th graders out there who would love to wrestle 103 in high school and try to be the first 5 time state champion in Kansas history.
If a rule was broken in 2007, the question is what to do about it now? Maybe there is an explanation. Whatever the case, it looks like the kid may be the first 3 time 14 and under medalist.
I think KansasBoy has a legitimate concern.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,153
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,153 |
I just noticed this topic and did a little checking with our membership records. According to this wrestler's birthdate, he should compete in the 14U age division this year. If he competed in the 14U age group two years ago he was in violation of our rules in that year and should have been disqualified. Our rules do not penalize him this year for an infraction two years ago.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377 |
If a rule was broken in 2007, the question is what to do about it now? Maybe there is an explanation. Whatever the case, it looks like the kid may be the first 3 time 14 and under medalist.
Well, Here are the U12/80 pound State placers in 2007. That could explain a lot. 1st Levi Eck Brawlers 2nd Hunter Haralson Baldwin 3rd Dylan McKinney Paola 4th Regis Weiss III Russell 5th Wyatt Villers Ark City 6th Collin Sommers Derby
Last edited by ReDPloyd; 03/24/09 07:15 AM.
Lee Girard
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19 |
I believe it is quite clear why this boy decided to wrestle up instead of where he should have wrestled. He had an advantage...fewer kids...easier competition..better chance of placing?? That is the only time he made it to the finals....hasn't done so well the other years..when he actually has to wrestle the competition. I think it is really too bad that parents would allow their child to "cheat" ...just so they would have a better showing a state. It is even worse that a club would allow this to happen. How many other kids in this club were allowed to do this as well?? Might be something worth looking into. How do we keep this from happening again? Providing birth certificates at Subs? This might be something to be discussed at the State Body meeting next year.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327 |
I just noticed this topic and did a little checking with our membership records. According to this wrestler's birthdate, he should compete in the 14U age division this year. If he competed in the 14U age group two years ago he was in violation of our rules in that year and should have been disqualified. Our rules do not penalize him this year for an infraction two years ago. However we do create an exception allowing 6U kids wrestling in 8U. USA Wrestling allows Cadets to wrestle Juniors as well. Perhaps in this case a closer look should be given to the birth records and verification should be made to insure that we don't have a case of an "altered" proof of birth.
Will Cokeley (708)267-6615 willcokeley@gmail.com
|
|
|
0 members (),
149
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums11
Topics36,119
Posts250,750
Members12,309
|
Most Online1,305 Mar 12th, 2025
|
|
|
|