Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling Kansas KWCA
Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas
USAW USA Wrestling Kansas
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1239 03/10/04 08:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Who would be in favor of a challange for 2nd?
Challange for 2nd
single choice
Votes accepted starting: 12/31/69 06:00 PM
You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.

#1240 03/11/04 10:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 328
Member
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 328
for what tournament?

#1241 03/11/04 10:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 328
Member
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 328
are you talkin about state?

#1242 03/11/04 11:30 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 125
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 125
I think their talking more in general terms. Not talking about anyone tournament. The loser from the Championship match wrestling the winner from the backside for 2nd & 3rd place. Sounds good to me.

#1243 03/11/04 12:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
I am mainly talking about the State Tournament, as when we go dist 1 against 2 and 3 against 4 for instance, alot of times the championship is wresteled in the semi finals match, this is really unfair for the kid that got 3rd, when he/she is actually the 2nd best wrestler in the state.

I also realize that the 2nd place finisher, is down, but all the national tournaments have a challange, and the wrestler has to be ready for the next challange, that is just part of our great sport. Why can't we have a challange at state? Lets make it a true second!

I would really like to hear feed back on this issue from members of our state board like comments from Mr. Juby or Mr. Grater, as they do a fine job running our kids programs and it would be nice to hear there opinions.

#1244 03/11/04 12:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 601
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 601
I agree that in some of the bigger tournaments, including state, that the seeding is not as good as it should be. Sometimes a fluke at districts will place a wrestler higher or lower than they truly should be, but I think they do the best they can with what they have to work with. If there was a challange for 2nd, it would not leave any doubts in anyone who should be placed 2nd.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 108 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Carl Laughlin, Bjones2014, ColeO, JTapia, Camden Schroeder
12,312 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums11
Topics36,125
Posts250,761
Members12,312
Most Online2,939
Nov 27th, 2025
Top Posters
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,262
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.28 Page Time: 0.036s Queries: 28 (0.027s) Memory: 3.1784 MB (Peak: 3.7135 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-12-08 09:25:49 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS