|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2 |
At a match this weekend the wrestlers had wrestled for one minute when the ref called a technical on the kid & gave him one minute to put underwear on. He did not make it back in time and lost the match. Is there a rule that you have to have underwear on?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696 |
Congrats, Aquinas! Great job, Hat Town! Salyer Rules!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 138
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 138 |
Yes, I think so. The rules say something like a suitable under garment and then defines it. I know that boxers are a no-no.
Rick Williams Colby High School
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 846
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 846 |
Boxer's are a no-no? Isn't it obvious when someone where's boxers? I see it all the time, I've even done it because I totally forgot to bring the briefs. What about man-thongs...are those a no-no?
Taggin' for Tyler
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 226
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 226 |
Technically no.
But as a man....heck yes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 61
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 61 |
go this the man thong
those win u matchs
its me and you tonight rosie palm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,426
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,426 |
Rick is correct. Rule 4-1-1 States a suitable undergarment shall be worn when tights are not worn. There is a little bit if interpretation that goes on here and its left at the discretion of the ref. Here is my point of view. To me a suitable undergarment is one that would not cause the singlet to be excessively baggy. So if you had a very tight fitting pair of boxers similar to biker pants that did not extend below the 4 inch required inseam of the singlet I don't see any problem with that. So called "tighty whities" would be the prefered undergarment, or a jock strap if you prefer (and I can't imagine anyone that would!). I have seen wrestlers who wear these things called "boxer briefs" they are a hybrid of the two they are shorter in the legs than a real boxer and they fit close to the skin, and they are acceptable. But no you can't go commando for sure, and if you have baggy boxer shorts they are unacceptable as well, it presents a danger of getting ones fingers broken. I can't believe someone actaully went out and wrestled with no undergarment I find that amusing.
William Nigel Isom Officials Director (USAWKS) KSHSAA #14274 USAWKS #577 Riley KS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,262
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,262 |
if you have baggy boxer shorts they are unacceptable as well, it presents a danger of getting ones fingers broken. Fingers in the boxers? So that's what kids call it these days.
Yours in wrestling,
The Swayz swayz.wrestling@gmail.com recruiting help, promoting the sport& more!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 734
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 734 |
Fellas, lets not play around here. Put on a jock or something. I am glad the ref was on top of the situation and applied the rule correctly. I'm not sure that going "commando" in your singlet is what is best for our sport.
Bill DeWitt Wrestling Fan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538 |
Commando
Great for Girls, Bad for Boys....
Alex R. Ryan KSHSAA Official #15616 USAWKS Official #707
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448 |
i always go commando wats wrong with that
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538 |
that's disturbing, just plain disturbing....
Alex R. Ryan KSHSAA Official #15616 USAWKS Official #707
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538 |
Originally posted by Michael Malay: its a good luck thing Whatever you call it 
Alex R. Ryan KSHSAA Official #15616 USAWKS Official #707
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 55
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 55 |
I'd have to say thats probably one of the grossest things I've heard in my entire life.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,426
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,426 |
Michael please never come on any mat that I am officiating without underwear on, for the sake of my sanity.
William Nigel Isom Officials Director (USAWKS) KSHSAA #14274 USAWKS #577 Riley KS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448 |
think about that when u go to bed by the way im jk about this whole thing
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19 |
I find it disturbing Nigel is the expert on undergarment fashions... Can we say, Man crush
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 133
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 133 |
micheal if I remeber correctly your had an incident earlier this season. I would of thought you would not make the same mistake twice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,426
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,426 |
Wait a minute so because I am a male, a former wrestler, and I've seen all of these undergarments at Wal-mart that means I have a "man-crush"? Wow only Manhattan High School logic could have made up that conclusion, I think i'm going to have to write to the school board and ask them what exactly are they teaching the kids these day over in that school district.
William Nigel Isom Officials Director (USAWKS) KSHSAA #14274 USAWKS #577 Riley KS
|
|
|
0 members (),
149
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums11
Topics36,119
Posts250,750
Members12,309
|
Most Online1,305 Mar 12th, 2025
|
|
|
|