Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling Kansas KWCA
Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas
USAW USA Wrestling Kansas
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#104929 03/11/07 03:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 46
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 46
Will they list the enrties for this tournament?

maverick #104980 03/12/07 06:54 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
They have not in the past but we can hope.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Beeson #104985 03/12/07 07:10 AM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,933
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,933
In this case, it might be best if the parents/wrestlers don't know how big the brackets are till they get there. Also, posting the brackets could lend itself to another club trying to steal what is likely a very profitable tourney. Oh wait, NM!


maverick #105014 03/12/07 10:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
Wondering if anyone had a clue on how to rate their wrestler if he/she was not definitely at the bottom (1) or at the top (10). Maybe go by record? Also wondered why the 1-10 rating was used instead of regular A B C D.Any input would be appreciated!

jarby #105024 03/12/07 11:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
See if this works for you 10=A+, 9=A, 8=A-, 7=B+, 6=B, 5=B-, 4=C+, 3=C, 2=C-, 1=D. Don't know for sure but that is how we handled it.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Beeson #105028 03/12/07 12:06 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
Very helpful. Thank You! Makes me feel better that we were pretty much on target.

jarby #105071 03/12/07 04:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 46
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 46
any early picks out there for some of the weights at this tournament? Let's have fun with this!

maverick #105122 03/12/07 09:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 249
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 249
I would tend to agree that this must be a profitable tournament. My son went 2 years and had 64 man brackets both years. I will say that they spare no expense when it comes to the plaques. They are VERY nice. I recommend it to all our 6 & u's.


Annette & FJ VanAnne
sekcoach@yahoo.com
VanFam7 #105176 03/13/07 10:15 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Just curious, how many wrestlers (on average) are in each weight class. Also, is it double elimination or how is it set up?

Bruiser #105201 03/13/07 12:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 104
Member
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 104
From attending last year, the popular weight classes had 64 man brackets. Some of the higher weight kids had 8/16 man brackets. My son wrestled last year in a 64 man bracket at the weight of 46lbs. They place up to 6th place from what I remember. It is a great tourn. with a lot of 6 and under kids. Also plan for a long day.

lynseywebb #105224 03/13/07 12:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
Yes, double elimination. They wrestle for top six places. They probably use 1-10 instead of A-D due to the number of entries. It would help them seed the entries more accurately.


Larry Woltje
firehawk88 #105230 03/13/07 01:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
So a kid can lose a match and still end up winning 1st if they come through the losers bracket?

Bruiser #105233 03/13/07 01:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 408
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 408
I don't see it that way....they go to the left side of the bracket & the best they can do is 3rd after coming through the back side.

You want to always stay to the right....heading to the Championship round.....which you will then wrestle for 1st or 2nd.

Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks


In it to win it.
Bruiser #105234 03/13/07 01:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
no, unless they make it to the finals and lose, they finish second, otherwise when they lose they can finish third at best.


Larry Woltje
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
You are correct in saying that, but I have always known true double elimination to mean just that. You must be beaten twice to be put out. So it if the left side comes back and beats the right side twice they could win.

I have been confused all year by brackets saying they are double elimination yet the best they can get is third.

Bruiser #105237 03/13/07 01:45 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
they are double elimination. they aren't winner take all. the difference is that the third place finisher finishes third. they don't get eliminated. if that makes any sense.


Larry Woltje
firehawk88 #105241 03/13/07 02:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Yes, that makes sense. Thanks!

Bruiser #105249 03/13/07 02:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
When they lose a match before the finals round, they go to the left. Once they are on the left side of the bracket, they will not wrestle anyone on the right side. Therefore, they can do no better than 3rd.

bullpuppride #105253 03/13/07 03:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 401
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 401
In my opinion, when you have large brackets such as these and place top 6 instead of top 4, there should be a challenge for 2nd from the backside for the 3rd place finisher provided the person who took 2nd didn't beat the 3rd place finisher to the backside of the bracket. In a sense, the champion of the bracket will have no losses, but the 2nd and 3rd place finishers will each have one loss, so 2 kids will have the same number of losses in the same bracket and both losses come from the same kid (possibly) so a challenge for 2nd would resolve the issue. In fact the 3rd place finisher may actually have a better record within the bracket than the 2nd place finisher due to the sheer number of matches it takes to get to the consolation finals. Just a thought to get the kids some even more mat time. Then again in a 64 man bracket the kids would probably get plenty of mat time \:\)


"Everything we do should be for the future of our children."
Crash99 #105258 03/13/07 03:31 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,595
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,595
... and of course you can run into problems with the number of matches wrestled in a day!


Are you making a POSITIVE difference in the life of kids?

Randy Hinderliter
USAW Kansas
KWCA Rep/Coaches Liaison
Ottawa University Volunteer Assistant
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 430 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
JTapia, Camden Schroeder, CoachLongSES, Super Admin, HMullin
12,309 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums11
Topics36,119
Posts250,750
Members12,309
Most Online1,305
Mar 12th, 2025
Top Posters
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,262
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.26 Page Time: 0.146s Queries: 55 (0.133s) Memory: 3.2396 MB (Peak: 3.7141 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-09 18:21:01 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS