I just find it amazing this issue is dividing the membership in such a manner. Instead of finding a way to get every qualified coach a pass, some take the easy way out and work to restrict. I hope none of the people who voted for the issue did so thinking it would be easier for them to get 'extra' passes. Its as if some enjoy the fact this issue works to divide the members each year. It come up every year I have been on this forum. I understand the demands of our state leadership and of our coaches - I spend 5 years as the sec/trea in our local union and I know these types of jobs are demanding. But, work for win-win solutions. Punishing those who left early is not a win-win answer. AND, the idea anyone in a volunteer organization would have to have an excuse as to why they left a meeting early is extremely upsetting. Its not a job, its volunteer. Was there anything done at the meeting that could not be done on the internet. AND, the idea I stayed, so should you, also does not reflect the nature of a volunteer organization. The thought that someone will have to beg to get the chance to be with his son at the most important tournament of the year, really upset me. I don't expect a pass this year. Thats ok, my son is older. But, I will miss being on the floor and seeing people I like and maybe have not seen all year. Its nice to be on the floor. And I just do not understand why restrictions are all people are looking at. NO this vote was not passed with the best interest of the kids, and thanks Randy for reminding everyone what this is really all about.
