I have a question i would like to ponder with all of you. I agree that the intent of the B v. S dual is very good and the coordinators work hard to get matches. I also know it is hard sometimes b/c some seniors are just done after that last match of the year.
However, does it really need to be a big school v. small school format?
We all know that the million dollar question always is, which classifications are tougher. Big Schools believe they are tougher because they have more students etc. Small schools believe they are tougher because they have to go through a bigger region to make it too state. In all actuality, every year, is different and the depth of each classification changes with those years. The question will never be answered, yet is always fun for some to argue about.
Here is my thought. It should instead go back to or be a ALL-STAR match. It is a great opportunity for show-case the talent in the state. I am glad that they put an Caldwell v. Watson match this year, but does it really need to be considered an exhibition match? Why not let 5A guys pair up with 6A guys. 4A wrestlers pair up with 321A wrestlers. The objective should be to make the most competitive matches.
Why not put Callahan and Orneleas together. It would be a great match. I think if we focused on making the best possible match-ups and not Big v. Small it would be a much greater show.
Also, I believe that at times this event might divide the state. I was talking with a coach and friend this morning and we feel that last thing we need in this state is a division. We want to get up to the level of some more competitive states therefore, we must unite as a group and make our competition better. There could be a lot of possible matches that could take place tonight that fans would love to see. However, putting the Big v. Small Divison is keeping that from happening.
Again, it is my opinion. Let me know what you think!
Coach Church
