What if he gets hurt the 1st match? That was a dumb point IMO.
I love coming on here, posting my opinion to get called out by someone saying it is a dumb point then there is nothing to explain why, doug747. Really, dumb point huh. I am in favor of allowing the 6th match for the purposes of a placement match but someone out there will challenge that, especially if Kansas changes it's rules against other states. Let's hope it doesn't come to that, but I could see it happen. Dumb point I guess.
By the way, it would not matter if a wrestler were to get hurt in the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth match, my questions was what if he got hurt in the sixth match if Kansas allowed it? If it happens in match 1-5 okay, that's the normal course of things. What I was suggesting is, if we allow a sixth match and a wrestler were to get injured, might that be a liability, might someone suggest their wrestler were hurt due to the negligence of the Kansas rules by allowing a sixth match. Is that a course we are willing to take. Added risk, definitely added reward.
