I'm all for the 6 match rule. When I coached I wanted it. I have no clue where the 5 match rule came from, but I'm guessing it was some arbitrary number plucked out of thin air.
Now that I officiate, I'm still for it. Would I need more money? Not for the way it was presented (16 man tourney, for medal matches). I guess if I were officiating a five dual format that went to six I might appreciate more, but I'm sure I'd still do it for the same dough.
To touch on Will's point of officials being evaluated...I'm all for finding a way to do so fairly. I think you'll find that most of the "good old boys" are some of the best in the state. I would welcome every opportunity to improve my officiating skills, however. I like hearing from coaches and other refs, as long as it's coming in a civilized manner. My best days are those that I go unnoticed. I also think we need to find a way to get more young guys involved. With that being said, I have a tough time giving AD's names of young guys that I've seen show up late, hungover, or been complete no-shows.
That's my two cents, let me know if I owe you change.
Ryan
