Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling Kansas KWCA
Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas
USAW USA Wrestling Kansas
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,248
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,248
Any thoughts on weight class changes this year? Is

It is kind of early only after a portion of the 1st year. My thought was cutting out a weight in the middle of the bell curve was not a good decision and adding it to the upper weights. The weight change is making it harder to fill the 3 upper weights with an experienced wrestler. I know some states have actually have been discussing reducing the number of weight classes back to about 12.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
Sean,

One thing I know, we haven't had a 195 pounder all year and have been a little heavy in the middle weights. I guess the other thing that I would say is that I hate seeing a high school wrestling program with open weights regardless of the weight class. In a perfect world, every team would be filled and we would have less of the WBFFs.


Lee Girard
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
Going to 106 was a good decision, a lot less opens and a lot better competition depth.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 118
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 118
I would be in favor of 12 weight classes

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
I have no problem with the 106 weight class. There will be, unfortunately, some wrestlers that are very talented that are too small to even make varsity at that weight. If all the weight classes were filled for every team, from 321a to 6a, I really wouldn't care.


Lee Girard
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 70
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 70
The problem I see is 235 lb'ers up against guys pushing 285lbs!
There is too much of a span between 220 and 285

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 104
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 104
I would cast a vote to put back a weight under 106. I realize there are probably less than 16 kids in the entire state at that weight, but giving up 10-15 pounds to the six pounders is not a competitive answer either. JMO

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,143
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,143
Originally Posted By: bigdaddy650r
The problem I see is 235 lb'ers up against guys pushing 285lbs!
There is too much of a span between 220 and 285


nobody fills the weights now. what would you propose?


"with attitude, will, and some spirit"
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
You can't add a weight below 106 due to the lack of wrestlers that would be in it. And you cant use the giving up weight as a reason for adding another class because some heavyweights are giving up 60 or more pounds.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327
Originally Posted By: ReDPloyd
I have no problem with the 106 weight class. There will be, unfortunately, some wrestlers that are very talented that are too small to even make varsity at that weight. If all the weight classes were filled for every team, from 321a to 6a, I really wouldn't care.


I don't think we need to create a weight class that caters to freshmen. No other varsity sport offers such an attractive option to make varsity as a freshman. One class, 106, is plenty and it is low enough.

We need the class put back in the middle.


Will Cokeley
(708)267-6615
willcokeley@gmail.com
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
I would like to raise 106 to 108 or 109, that way you would be more likely to fill a bracket because many teams don't have anyone that small. And if there arn't many people at that weight at regionals then you end up with several kids that go to state and go 2 and out. Which is very demoralizing.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted By: Mr MooCow
I would like to raise 106 to 108 or 109, that way you would be more likely to fill a bracket because many teams don't have anyone that small. And if there arn't many people at that weight at regionals then you end up with several kids that go to state and go 2 and out. Which is very demoralizing.


The same amount of kids will go 2 and out no matter what. The same amount of demoralizing will happen also. cry

Last edited by Beeson; 02/14/12 08:20 PM.

Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 148 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
JTapia, Camden Schroeder, CoachLongSES, Super Admin, HMullin
12,309 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums11
Topics36,119
Posts250,750
Members12,309
Most Online1,305
Mar 12th, 2025
Top Posters
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,262
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.26 Page Time: 0.624s Queries: 38 (0.017s) Memory: 3.1810 MB (Peak: 3.7142 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-09 17:08:40 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS