Nice effort Contrarian.
Looks good although I sure wouldn't vote for it. Certainly would make 3A weaker than it already is, with all due respect, as lazyman_1 already indicated. Just looking at the ranges provided alone, 1327 for 6A, 546 for 5A and 194 for 4A, I wouldn't vote for it. How are those ranges fair?
We just need to leave it the way it is for the reasons already provided by D.W., wrestle nuts, X, etc. and the stats provided by Chief and Badbo.
Also check the other threads for info about 4A regionals with 8, 9, 10, 11 man brackets. The whole 3A/4A is tougher than 5A/6A thing because they have these monster 2 day tournaments with monster 16 man brackets thing is junk.
I could see evenly distributing 6A, 5A and 4A while leaving 3A as is but again the ranges even with that wouldn't be fair, although I know life is not fair and I know 3A/4A people think they have been getting the short end of the fair stick for some time and that they are due for some pay back although I don't necessarily agree with that.
Grand State is cool and everything but I would rather see a Dual State than a Grand State and I don't think that we would ever get both.
Although one class with one champ would be the easiest way to solve the problem, we would then have a bigger problem promoting our sport because there would be fewer opportunities for success and more people would be less likely to go out and that would hurt our sport. I don't think that we really want that do we?
