Kansas Wrestling Forums General Discussion High School Join the NCAA Pick-'Em!!!!

I forgot who I picked.... ...it doesn't matter, I'll win on shear looks alone

Bronco Wrestler, how do tou get avatars that arent on the list that usawks doesnt give you.

you go to a place where you know there's pictures and click on the picture and try to find the specific address for the picture, then copy it and go to your profile page then scroll down to where you found that one, then type in the address in the URL link thing, then select use this avatar, then down to update profile and you're all set

That was pretty easy. Thanks

No, I meant the Albuquerque regional. In my opinion it has more "dangerous" teams than the Austin regional. Kentucky is highly overrated in my book. Sorry, if there's any Kentucky fans out there.

Back to wrestling, after reading about the National Duals, Illinois looks like they could make it interesting. So does Lehigh. Illinois won five of the ten matches in the dual against Oklahoma State. But when Osu did win it was by pin. So it might be a little closer than I thought at first.

I would have to agree with Kentucky being overrated. KU beat them on the road, without Simien. Thats sayin something.

I already joined another group but will keep tabs on everyone else.

Ya Kentucky is overated bt there is also OU and Duke in the Austin Regional, in the Albuquerque regional is Washingon. They havent done anything to deserve that good of a seed, they may have a good record but their confrence isn't tough at all. Oklahoma beat Uconn and Ku and i feel they got screwed on their seeding. If ou would have been thrown into the Albequerque regional they would be in the final 4 for shure, KU, or Ou should have been put into the Albeuqueqeu regional.

You want to talk about a team that got shafted on their seed......... Louisville. Wake Forest,Gonzaga, and Louisville are quality teams. Georgia Tech is a dangerous team with experience. Then you have a Pacific team with 3 losses. One of the reasons why I said the Albuquerque regional was tougher was because the lower seeds are more dangerous teams. Plus Kentucky is overrated. Okalahoma is a little too streaky for me. Plus they almost lost to Kstate. They got bailed out by a guy who made a lucky shot. I wouldn't say they got robbed of a higher seed. There were more deserving of higher seeds.

I'd have to pick Buhler winning over UCLA in the second round.

Well not to start an arguement but OU did come out to beat kstate, i dont care if it was a close game, they also beat all the other big 12 teams. and big 12 is by far the toughest confrence in the nation. All the teams you named are in a weak confrence.

Did you just say the Big 12 is "by far" the toughest conference in the tournament as if it's not even debatable? Someone's a bit biased...

So you are saying that the ACC is a weak conference? That sir is an absurb statement along with the other one you made above.

You must be joking to say that the Big 12 isnt as tough as the ACC. the records might not be as appealing, but all the mojority of their losses have come from one another. The ACC has three good teams and the rest of them are pushovers.

I went 14-2 on the 1st day the only two games I got wrong:

Texas losing to Nevada

Creighton losing to West Virginia

I went 13-3 in the first day and i'm tied for second.

LSU loss, Texas loss, and Bama loss

duke will win it all against boston college

I'm not the only one who thinks like this, most of the college basketball experts also think this way.

Oh yeah, baby! I'm currently in 2nd place! Go Tarheels!!!! (BOO!!! @ all of the Big XII teams, they didn't have anyone advance past the sweet 16, therefore ruining half of my final four (and half of my championship game)).