Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling Kansas KWCA
Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas
USAW USA Wrestling Kansas
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 17
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
Originally Posted By: Beeson
She will be 1-1 at worst.


She will receive 2 Forfeits to the finals. Where is the victory?


She is on the front side. Her opponents are on the backside. She showed up to wrestle, they chose not to wrestle. She gets the victory. So she will be 2-1, if she loses, going to state with a winning record at regionals.

Side note. Chief and I are discussing this via text. Im just highlighting some of my points.

Last edited by Beeson; 02/15/13 10:18 AM.

Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
The standing criteria that I have always seen is if the whistle blows to start a match, it counts on your record. If a wrestler weighs in then gets sick and goes home. He does not receive two losses on his record.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
The standing criteria that I have always seen is if the whistle blows to start a match, it counts on your record. If a wrestler weighs in then gets sick and goes home. He does not receive two losses on his record.


FORFEIT—In a dual match, a forfeit is received by a wrestler when his opponent, for any reason, fails to appear for the
match. In order to receive the forfeit, the wrestler must have made weight, be dressed in a wrestling uniform, and appear on the mat.

In a tournament situation, once a wrestler has made weight and appears on the bracket, if for any reason he fails to appear for a match, it is a forfeit. In order to receive the forfeit, his opponent shall have made weight, be dressed in a legal wrestling uniform and shall appear on the mat. A forfeit shall eliminate a contestant from further competition in a tournament.

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
EXCEPTION: When the forfeit is because of an injury or illness which occurred during the tournament, the tournament
director, in consultation with available medical personnel and the coach of the injured contestant shall determine
the contestant’s ability to continue. Extenuating circumstances concerning the injury or illness as it relates to default or
forfeit for scoring purposes, shall be considered by the tournament director. A competitor who is injured in a match and
because of this injury is unable to compete in his next match is not to be denied the opportunity to place in a tournament
and score points for his team (refer to Rule 10-2-4, NFHS Rule Book). Therefore, if the injured wrestler is allowed by the
tournament manager an opportunity to place by forfeit, he does not need to appear on the mat. (Refer to NFHS Casebook
Situation 10.2.4 and 10.2.5.)

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
The standing criteria that I have always seen is if the whistle blows to start a match, it counts on your record. If a wrestler weighs in then gets sick and goes home. He does not receive two losses on his record.


But both of these wrestlers will wrestle on the backside later in the day. A wrestler cant pick and choose who they will wrestle to keep their record pristine. A wrestler cant take 3rd and be undefeated just because they refused to wrestle the 1st or 2nd place wrestler.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
Originally Posted By: Scooter
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
The standing criteria that I have always seen is if the whistle blows to start a match, it counts on your record. If a wrestler weighs in then gets sick and goes home. He does not receive two losses on his record.


FORFEIT—In a dual match, a forfeit is received by a wrestler when his opponent, for any reason, fails to appear for the
match. In order to receive the forfeit, the wrestler must have made weight, be dressed in a wrestling uniform, and appear on the mat.

In a tournament situation, once a wrestler has made weight and appears on the bracket, if for any reason he fails to appear for a match, it is a forfeit. In order to receive the forfeit, his opponent shall have made weight, be dressed in a legal wrestling uniform and shall appear on the mat. A forfeit shall eliminate a contestant from further competition in a tournament.


Having said that, I have never seen a wrestler who is sick or does not appear for a match, record both that match and the match on the backside as losses on their record. Nor should the wrestler receiving the forfeit count that as a win on their record. There are several in the current rankings who rightfully have not.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
BUT they are NOT sick, they are just refusing to wrestle the opponent placed before them. Therefore a loss.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
Originally Posted By: Beeson
BUT they are NOT sick, they are just refusing to wrestle the opponent placed before them. Therefore a loss.


What if they get sick?


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
Originally Posted By: Beeson
BUT they are NOT sick, they are just refusing to wrestle the opponent placed before them. Therefore a loss.


What if they get sick?


Then I would assume they would forfeit their second match also, therefor being eliminated.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 291
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 291
Originally Posted By: Scooter
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
The standing criteria that I have always seen is if the whistle blows to start a match, it counts on your record. If a wrestler weighs in then gets sick and goes home. He does not receive two losses on his record.


FORFEIT—In a dual match, a forfeit is received by a wrestler when his opponent, for any reason, fails to appear for the
match. In order to receive the forfeit, the wrestler must have made weight, be dressed in a wrestling uniform, and appear on the mat.

In a tournament situation, once a wrestler has made weight and appears on the bracket, if for any reason he fails to appear for a match, it is a forfeit. In order to receive the forfeit, his opponent shall have made weight, be dressed in a legal wrestling uniform and shall appear on the mat. A forfeit shall eliminate a contestant from further competition in a tournament.


So if a wrestler FF on the front side they are automatically done and can't wrestle on the back side?


Jeremy Molloy
Derby Wrestling
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 75
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 75
Originally Posted By: Jeremy Molloy
Originally Posted By: Scooter
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
The standing criteria that I have always seen is if the whistle blows to start a match, it counts on your record. If a wrestler weighs in then gets sick and goes home. He does not receive two losses on his record.


FORFEIT—In a dual match, a forfeit is received by a wrestler when his opponent, for any reason, fails to appear for the
match. In order to receive the forfeit, the wrestler must have made weight, be dressed in a wrestling uniform, and appear on the mat.

In a tournament situation, once a wrestler has made weight and appears on the bracket, if for any reason he fails to appear for a match, it is a forfeit. In order to receive the forfeit, his opponent shall have made weight, be dressed in a legal wrestling uniform and shall appear on the mat. A forfeit shall eliminate a contestant from further competition in a tournament.


So if a wrestler FF on the front side they are automatically done and can't wrestle on the back side?


I had the same question. That is certainly the way the rule quoted above reads . . .

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,481
Originally Posted By: Beeson
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
Originally Posted By: Beeson
BUT they are NOT sick, they are just refusing to wrestle the opponent placed before them. Therefore a loss.


What if they get sick?


Then I would assume they would forfeit their second match also, therefor being eliminated.


Stomach ailments are many times short term.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 291
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 291
If the rule quoted above is true it will not matter they are not going to be able to wrestle the back side and Beeson is correct. I am trying to find this rule but have not yet.


Jeremy Molloy
Derby Wrestling
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8
B
BSD Offline
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8
Are you suggesting the administrators, coaches and wrestlers of these Catholic schools will break one of the Ten Commandments for a wrestling tournament?

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 33
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 33
Keith - First, disagreeing is far from disrespecting. Secondly, I actually have three daughters all if which would be more then tough enough to be successful wrestling, but I do not feel like it is correct to allow them. So If they wanted to I would say no. But they agree with my values. Is in my opinion that to teach boys to respect girls and women it does not go hand hand to have then wrestle girls. I strongly feel that it is not positive for the sport, case in point look at all the negative it has caused. All the people out there looking down at our great sport. Lastly I too have been around the sport for a long time, stepped on the mat 38 years ago as a 4 year old, so it isn't my rodeo either sir.

Tim King

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
http://www.kshsaa.org/Publications/Wrestling.pdf

They can wrestle on the backside with exception by the tournament director which will happen.

It counts as a win, does not count as a loss.

Last edited by Scooter; 02/15/13 01:58 PM.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
So she could go 3-0 and take First or 2-1 and take Second. Third place would be 2-0? Ridiculous, if there is a winner there is a loser. How can there be a winner without a loser? Wait for it....EVERYBODY IS A WINNER. I knew that America was working towards that, but didn't think there was anyway,logically, that it could happen. But leave it to KSHSAA, just write it in the rule books that EVERYBODY IS A WINNER. Biggest LOAD OF CRAP I have ever heard.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 649
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 649
Beeson is my Hero!!! Tell it like it is.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8
B
BSD Offline
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8
I see no exception for religious beliefs only for injury and sickness.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 146
3
Member
Member
3 Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 146
Tim-First off, I'm sorry if you feel that I was questioning your experince in this sport. It obviously hit a soft spot as seen by your "rodeo" comment. I simply was saying in the time I've spent around the sport I've tried to respect the opponent across the mat as a wrestler not as a certain gender or race. Secondly, it's not always the disagreement part that can be construed as disrespectful, it's the context of the argument. I personally respect your decision that you would refuse to let your daughters wrestle...and I have know doubt they are tough enough to compete. I just don't agree with that philosophy as a parent to restrict my child from participating in something that she is well within her rights to participate. Now how would I feel about it? I don't know because it hasn't been presented to me. I would like to think I would be 100% accepting and supportive...but I know for a fact I wouldn't just be hardline and say she couldn't. But that's MY philosophy as a parent...just because I don't agree with others ways, doesn't mean I can't respect their views. To me, the negativity that has come to light isn't caused by the fact that girls are allowed to wrestle...it's been caused by a non-wrestling governing body restricting someone from competing. But like I said, just because I don't agree with that view...doesn't mean I don't respect it.

Keith Heniss

Page 5 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 17

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 149 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
JTapia, Camden Schroeder, CoachLongSES, Super Admin, HMullin
12,309 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums11
Topics36,119
Posts250,750
Members12,309
Most Online1,305
Mar 12th, 2025
Top Posters
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,262
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.26 Page Time: 0.035s Queries: 55 (0.024s) Memory: 3.2613 MB (Peak: 3.7135 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-09 10:08:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS