I don't think the ones you mentioned are over-rated but yes a lot of the ranked kids in 321A are not deserving of the rank, but I think I see the problem. Do you just rank 2 or 3 and no more or do you try to put people on the list to have 6. It is early and so a lot of results haven't been well published. Some coaches are quick to make a pitch for their kid to be ranked, deserving or not. Other coaches have no interest in getting their kid ranked and would just as soon they go out and perform. It makes ranking difficult if you try to fill out the top 6 in each weight, you have to go with names you have been given.
