I thought that I would see what kind of different opinions there are out there on this subject. During seeding meetings there seemed to be a little controversy about 6 and under kids when it came to seeding them in 8 and under. One side says that it doesn't matter that they are 6 and under they should be seated according to win/loss records and so on. The other side says that the competion is tougher in 8 and under and that the 6 and under kids should be seated lower because of that.
I see both sides really. Since there is not a 6 and under at Topeka why should a 6 and under kid be penalized for something that is out of their control. On the other hand I also agree that it is tougher for a 6 year old to compete with kids that can actually be 9 and wrestle 8 and under.
What are your opinions on this?
