Am i the only one who seems to realize that all of this arguing over whether or not the ref. should have given wiscombe an escape point or not is mute? I mean seriously guys, i think if memory serves me that in fact the reason that wiscombe won that match was not because he had gotten away from Malloy, but rather because Malloy was attatched to Wiscombe's ankle therefor warrenting a stalling call. Malloy had already been warned in the match, and therefore this one cost him a point and the title. Now i know that some of you will say that the whole point of the top guy is to stall out in double overtime, but in fact and Richard Salyer could back me on this one i'm sure. In double overtime the first man to score a point is declared the winner, and if no man scores then the offensive wrestler (man on top) wins. The top man must still try to work for points, and stalling can most definetly be called. Either way it was a great match, and both wrestlers deserve praise for their match.
