"If wrestler B starts towards the edge of the mat, strips his the hands of wrestler A and is more than an arms length away with the back towards A just as B goes off the mat it may be possible to gain an escape in this situation provided A does not follow up and try to maintain the advantage. The key here is that wrestler B has not turned and faced wrestler A. But if wrestler A is content to let wrestler B go without trying to maintain advantage, it should be an escape. Again, this is in the judgement of the official."
the book says "if wrestler a is content to let wrestler b go without trying to maintain advantage, it should be an escape"
since in my question the top wrestler did not try to maintain control couldnt it just as likely be an escape as a stall? also if the top wrestler shoots on and gets the take-down just as bottom wrestler is turning toward him is it a judgement as to whether to award an escape and takedown or to just say no loss of control? (even though they are an arms legnth away?
